Legal Opinion

Slutzker v. Rieber

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 19, 1942No. Docket 149/37PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This cause was originated by a stockholder of Barber Asphalt Corporation in behalf of the corporation to restrain certain officers and directors of the company from an alleged undertaking to destroy the established business and divert the corporate assets from purposes authorized by its charter and to oblige the officers and directors to account and to compensate the corporation for the consequent losses. It is evident that this suit is intended to be prosecuted in the right of, and for the benefit of, the corporation. The right of the complainant to maintain the suit has not been challenged.

I…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Robinson v. SmithNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  3. Davenport v. DowsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Ellerman v. Chicago Junction Railways & Union Stockyards Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1891
  5. Appleton v. American Malting Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1903

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Swenson v. ThibautCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Beyerbach v. Juno Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Maldonado v. FlynnCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1980
  4. Barrett v. Southern Connecticut Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  5. State Ex Rel. Weede v. BechtelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API