Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

1. Defendant’s motion for judgment of nonsuit, on tbe ground that plaintiff’s evidence conclusively showed contributory negligence on his part, was properly denied. From a careful consideration of the evidence in the record before us, viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff in accord with the accepted rule on motions of this kind, we are led to the conclusion that it was a case for the jury. Meacham v. R. R., 213 N. C., 609, 197 S. E., 189; Quinn v. R. R., 213 N. C., 48, 195 S. E., 85; Cole v. Koonce, 214 N. C., 188, 198 S. E., 637; Williams v. Express Lines, 198 N. C., 193, 151…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Cole v. KoonceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Collins v. . LambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Cole v. . KoonceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Central Passenger Railway Co. v. KuhnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Seaboard System RR, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Collins v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. WithersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  4. Carter v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. In Re Will of EdensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API