Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Smersh
Nebraska Supreme Court
Eeeoe to the district court for Douglas county. Tried below before Wakeley, J. cited: Sehlueter v. Raymond Pros., 7 Neb., 281. Tingley v. Dolby, 13 Id., 371. Wilson v. Bwrney, 8 Id., 39.
1Opinion of the Court
Maxwell, Ch. J.
The defendant in error brought an action against one L. H. Webster, before a justice of the peace in Douglas county, and recovered a judgment for the sum of $45.83 and costs. Execution was duly issued on said judgment, and returned wholly unsatisfied. Afterwards an affidavit was filed before the justice alleging that the Union Pacific *752Railway Company was indebted to Webster, and thereupon a summons in garnishment was issued and served on said company. The proceedings in garnishment are set forth in the transcript as follows:
“April 9, 1884, J. S. Shropshire, for garnishee,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wright v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
- Haswell v. ParsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Wilson v. BurneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
- Albrecht v. TreitschkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
- Clark v. FoxworthyNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Luhrs v. HancockArizona Supreme Court · 1899
- Reed v. FletcherNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
- Schaller v. KurtzNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
- Elliot v. HallIdaho Supreme Court · 1892
- First Nat. Bank of Drumright v. KnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.