Legal Opinion

Le Clerg v. City of San Diego

California Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1933No. Docket No. S.F. 14761PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Petition for mandate to compel the Auditor and Controller of the City of San Diego to issue warrants to the petitioners for the full amount of judgments held by them against said city. It is alleged in substance in the petition that on or about the nineteenth day of December, 1927, the San Diego common council duly passed an ordinance numbered 11497, providing for the employment of special deputy engineers in the operating department of said city, prescribing their duties and fixing their compensation; that this employment was created in order to perform a large volume of street…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Long Beach v. LisenbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. DeasyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Cary v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Griswold v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Palace Hotel Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Douglass v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. C. J. Kubach Co. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Le Clerg v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Douglass v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API