Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Deasy
California Court of Appeal
PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel the inclusion within a municipal budget of the amount due upon a judgment for a tort, and to compel the levy of a tax for the payment of, the same. Writ issued. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
Application for a writ of mandate directed to the auditor of the city and cqunty of San Francisco and also to the persons constituting the board of supervisors of said city and county and to the mayor thereof, by the terms of which writ the said auditor shall be commanded to certify to the treasurer of said city and county the fact and amount of a certain^ judgment for the sum of $29,808.94, and interest and costs, obtained by the petitioner herein against said municipality and remaining unpaid; and by the terms of which writ the said mayor and board of supervisors shall be required to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McCracken v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Lewis v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- City of Long Beach v. LisenbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Arthur v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by11 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. San Bernardino High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Oscar Heyman Brother v. BathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Barker v. State Ex Rel. NapoleonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
- City of Saratoga v. HuffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.