Legal Opinion

State v. Trask

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 29, 1998No. 20325-1-IIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

— The State took leased land for public use. The value of the land was established at a jury trial. The lessor and lessee then moved for prejudgment interest, reasonable attorney fees, and reasonable expert fees (for convenience, prejudgment interest is hereafter referred to simply as “interest,” and reasonable attorney fees and reasonable expert witness fees are hereafter referred to simply as “fees”). The trial court denied their motions. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand in part.

For many years, Russell Trask owned waterfront land at Eagle Harbor.1 He operated a boat repair…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Badgett v. Security State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Edmands v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. Ross v. HardingWashington Supreme Court · 1964

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Loeffelholz v. Citizens for Leaders With Ethics & Accountability NowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  2. Anderson Hay & Grain Co. v. United Dominion Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. State v. TraskCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. CITY OF PUYALLUP v. HoganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. City of Puyallup v. HoganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API