Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Davis v. Barnett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 12, 1918No. 9542PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Original application for writ of prohibition by the State of Oklahoma, on the relation of J. Warren Davis, executor, etc., against Willard J. Barnett and others.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This is an original application in the Supreme Court for a writ of prohibition against the district court of Pottawatomie county. It seems that after the mandate affirming the judgment of the trial court in Re Nichols’ Will, Phebus et al. v. Vinson et al., 64 Okla. 241, 166 Pac. 1087, was received by the trial court, the same was spread of record and judgment rendered in pursuance of said mandate. Thereupon the losing parties in that cause commenced an action against the prevailing parties to set aside the judgment rendered against them, “For fraud practiced by the successful party in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Hardy, District JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Hirsh v. TwyfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. People ex rel. L'Abbe v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  4. City of Charleston v. LittlepageWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Morrison v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kincannon v. PughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Jackson v. HaneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Board of Ed. v. Philadelphia Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API