Legal Opinion

Geertz v. State Farm Fire and Casualty

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1969PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is an action brought by the named insured to recover under the medical payment provision of an insurance policy issued by defendant. Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiff.

Plaintiff’s wife and three of his children were injured in an automobile accident. Plaintiff incurred medical expenses on account of these injuries, and presented his claim to defendant for payment under the insurance policy issued by defendant. In response to the demand defendant informed plaintiff’s attorney that “If * * * the Geertz family has not settled their claim with the other carrier, we would be…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Company v. ChumbleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Rorvik v. North Pac. Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Marks v. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. LeaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. Hospital Service Corp. v. Pennsylvania InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Porter v. MFA Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Kracht v. Perrin, Gartland & DoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Allstate Insurance v. ReitlerMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Smith v. Travelers InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Phillips v. New Hampshire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API