Legal Opinion

Matter of Compensation of Condon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 29, 1981No. WCB 79-8395, CA 19561Published

1Opinion of the Court

629 P.2d 1324 (1981)

52 Or.App. 1043

In the matter of the Compensation of Robert V. Condon, Claimant.

Robert V. Condon, Petitioner,

v.

CITY OF PORTLAND, Respondent.

WCB No. 79-8395; CA 19561.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted April 15, 1981.

Decided June 29, 1981.

Robert K. Udziela, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, Kahn & O'Leary, Portland.

Bruce Bottini, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Reiter, Bricker, Zakovics & Querin, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and THORNTON and VAN HOOMISSEN, JJ.

VAN…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anfilofieff v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Matter of Compensation of CondonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Widener v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API