Legal Opinion

Shea v. Peters

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1928PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, C. J.

This is an appeal from a decree foreclosing two mechanics’ liens, which, it is claimed, w'ere invalid because not filed within the time required by the statute and also because of the alleged failure of the lienors to comply with Section 10191, Or. L., which requires that “every person * * furnishing material or supplies of any kind to be used in the construction * * of any building * * shall, not later than five days after the date of the first delivery, to any contractor or agent, of such material or supplies * * deliver or mail to the owner or reputed owner of the property, on, upon or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Medway Cotton Manufactory v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  2. Schram v. ManaryOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. James A. C. Tait & Co. v. StrykerOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Webber Lumber & Supply Co. v. EricksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stone-Fox, Inc. v. Vandehey Development Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Bukowitz v. Maryland Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  3. Shea v. GravesOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Washington County Irrigation District v. TalboyIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Bayes v. IsenbergIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API