Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Melville

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 4, 1923No. Civ. No. 3879PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

Defendants, who are husband and wife, appeal from a judgment reforming a deed which the wife, Ida M. Melville, as grantor, had executed to the plaintiff, Helen Robertson, as the grantee. The deed was reformed by correcting a misdescription of the land. The evidence is not in the record, the case coming here on the judgment-roll alone.

The allegations of the complaint are substantially these: The defendant Ida M. Melville was the owner and in possession of a parcel of land in the city of Los Angeles having a total frontage of sixty-five feet. It consisted of lot 3 of the G. M. Lashley tract,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Citizens' National Bank v. JudyIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Ward v. WatermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Baker v. PyattIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Newton v. HullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Enos v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gaylord v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  2. Gaylord v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944
  3. Laundreville v. MeroMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Radin v. Jewish National FundCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Mills v. SchulbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API