Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Lincoln Bank & Trust Co.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided February 22, 1937No. 1052PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILTON, District Judge.
This case is pending before me on motion to dismiss plaintiff’s bill in equity on three grounds:
1. Lack of equity.
2. Lack of lien.
3. No right of subrogation.
The plaintiff is a Maryland corporation engaged in the casualty and insurance business. The defendant is a state bank incorporated under the laws of Kentucky.
On December 14, 1933, C. J. Redmon, doing business under the name of the Redmon Heating Company, and engaged in the general contracting business, was awarded a contract by the United States Government for the construction of a public building at Roanoke, Va.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- First Nat. Bank of Seattle v. City Trust, Safe Deposit & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
- Standard Oil Co. v. DaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Glades County, Fla. v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- National Surety Corp. v. State National Bank of FrankfortCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
- Home Indemnity Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1970
- Acuity, a Mutual Insurance v. Planters Bank, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2005
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Lincoln Bank & Trust Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
- American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania v. Reynolds Concrete Pumping, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.