Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Phœnix Mutual Life Insurance Co. of Hartford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 10, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSears, P. J.

Defendant on July 16, 1921, issued its policy of insurance on the life of Charles E. Cummings. The plaintiffs are the beneficiaries. The policy provided in substance that upon receiving proof of the death of the insured, the defendant would pay to the beneficiaries the sum of $1,500, or if death was accidental, the company would pay the sum of $3,000. Charles P. Cummings’ death occurred on the 24th day of December, 1934, as the result of a hypodermic injection of apo-morphine.

The first contention of the appellant is that the death of the insured was not accidental within the terms of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Employers' Indemnity Corp. v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
  2. Tabor v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Orr v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Henricks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Austrian v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. Flandina v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  3. Flandina v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  4. Holland v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  5. Kim Soon Cha v. Equitable Variable Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API