Holland v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentAdel, J.
The language of the policy is not obscure or ambiguous; and, indeed, its provisions are those required by statute. (Insurance Law, §§ 88 and 101.) That language or phrasing which the majority seems to deem ambiguous parallels the phrasing in the statute, for which manner of expression the insurer may not be held responsible. Section 88 is not controlling, because the policy was not issued by a domestic company (Cummings v. Phœnix Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, 250 App. Div. 336, 338), but the policy, nevertheless, conforms to the requirements of that section. Section 101 of the Insurance Law…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cummings v. Phœnix Mutual Life Insurance Co. of HartfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Langley v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1920