Legal Opinion
Bieber v. Keeler Brass Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided April 3, 1995No. Docket 167566, 169848PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNeff, J.
In these consolidated worker’s compensation cases we are required to interpret § 381(1) of the Worker’s Disability Compensation Act (wdca), MCL 418.381(1); MSA 17.237(381X1), and resolve the conflict created by two opinions of the Worker’s Compensation Appellate Commission (wcac) that reach opposite results in cases presenting identical factual circumstances for purposes of legal analysis. The wcac affirmed a magistrate’s decision dismissing Edward Bieber, Jr.’s petition for benefits under § 381(1) for failure to file a second claim within two years after he last worked. The wcac affirmed a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jenkins v. Great Lakes Steel Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Oak Park Village v. GortonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Maner v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Maner v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Hunt v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lamp v. ReynoldsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Lakeland Neurocare Centers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Colbert v. Conybeare Law OfficeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000