Legal Opinion

Luck v. Wood

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 18, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Prentis, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The petitioner, Luck, complains of a judgment in favor of R. J. Wood and Mabel Holt Wood for damages claimed by them of him because of his breach of a contract to do certain specified work for the completion of a dwelling and to install a furnace therein, the property having been eotemporaneously. sold to them by Luck.

It is conceded that the case presents a single question of law, and that is whether or not the parol evidence rule was violated by the introduction of the testimony showing a written agreement between the parties, executed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Geoghegan Sons & Co. v. Arbuckle Bros.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  2. Oliver Refining Co. v. Portsmouth Cotton Oil Refining Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  3. Johnson v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Torrence v. SheddIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Dime Deposit & Discount Bank v. WescottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Countryside Orthopaedics, P.C. v. PeytonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  2. Becker v. Lagerquist Bros., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Sale v. FiggSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935
  4. Bolling v. Hawthorne Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1955
  5. Richmond Postal Credit Union, Inc. v. BookerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API