Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Grippi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 21, 1999PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 1, 1998, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

We find that substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause after her supervisor raised her voice to her during an argument. Criticism by a supervisor does not necessarily constitute good cause for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of ViruetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Claim of HargroveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of KarastathisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. In re the Claim of De RubyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. In re the Claim of HayesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. In re the Claim of RoawdenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. In re the Claim of DabadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API