Legal Opinion

Douglas v. Hall

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 5, 1956No. 17180PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Legge, Justice.

By order of the Probate Court for. Greenville. County dated March 25, 1955, respondent was adjudged insane and committed to the custody of appellant, Superintendent of *553the State Hospital. The order was issued pursuant to Section 32-912 of the 1952 Code, 1955 Supplement, upon application by respondent’s wife, and after examination of respondent by two designated physicians. Less than three months thereafter he applied to the Judge of the Richland County Court for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging in his petition therefor that he had been illegally committed and “is presently…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Murray v. HarrisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1919
  2. Ex Parte KlughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  3. State Ex Rel. Colvin v. Sup'r Ct.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Medlock v. Spearman, SupervisorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  5. City of Sumter v. BoyleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scott v. MacDougallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  2. Rikard v. South Carolina State HospitalDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1962
  3. Douglas v. HallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API