Legal Opinion

City of Sumter v. Boyle

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 13, 1924No. 11512PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

Habeas corpus proceedings in the original jurisdiction of this Court for the purpose of testing the validity of an ordinance of the City of Sumter, hereinafter more particularly described, for a violation of which the defendant was arrested.

On April 24, 1923, the City of Sumter passed an ordinance entitled:

“An ordinance to regulate the sale of meat and meat products for feed within the City of Sumter and to prescribe the conditions under which animals from which such meat is obtained shall be slaughtered and butchered.”

Section 1…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. New York Ex Rel. Lieberman v. Van De CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Kirk v. Board of HealthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Medlock v. Spearman, SupervisorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  2. Douglas v. HallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  3. Douglas v. HallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API