Legal Opinion

Brown v. Rogers

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1995No. 95-579PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Per curiam

In State ex rel. Pirman v. Money (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 591, 635 N.E.2d 26, we stated that habeas corpus is the proper action to challenge the failure to set bail following conviction, overruling Dapice v. Stickrath (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 298, 533 N.E.2d 339, which had in turn overruled Liberatore v. McKeen (1980), 63 Ohio St.2d 175, 17 O.O.3d 107, 407 N.E.2d 23. In Liberatore, we allowed the writ of habeas corpus and continued an appeal bond. The evidence in that case showed that the court of appeals had denied the request without stating any reasons. We held that “we are constrained to look…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pirman v. MoneyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Bloss v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Dapice v. StickrathOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Liberatore v. McKeenOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Lemmon v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Crigger v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Brantley v. GheeOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. McBroom v. RussellOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Lemmon v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API