Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Crigger v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1998No. 97-2519PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Per curiam

Waiver of Fees

Crigger initially asserts that the court of appeals erred by assessing $50 in filing fees against him. He contends that the court of appeals improperly applied R.C. 2969.22 et seq. because these statutes do not apply to habeas corpus actions and R.C. 2725.28 precluded the court from requiring that he pay the $50 filing fee.

However, Crigger’s own attachment to his affidavit of waiver and indigency indicated that the prison cashier certified that he had funds in his account to cover the fee. Crigger was not indigent, and we therefore need not address his contention that R.C.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State ex rel. Jackson v. McFaulOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Pegan v. CrawmerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Brown v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Douglas v. MoneyOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Al'shahid v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Smith v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Crigger v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State ex rel. Gilmore v. MitchellOhio Supreme Court · 1999

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API