State ex rel. Crigger v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Waiver of Fees
Crigger initially asserts that the court of appeals erred by assessing $50 in filing fees against him. He contends that the court of appeals improperly applied R.C. 2969.22 et seq. because these statutes do not apply to habeas corpus actions and R.C. 2725.28 precluded the court from requiring that he pay the $50 filing fee.
However, Crigger’s own attachment to his affidavit of waiver and indigency indicated that the prison cashier certified that he had funds in his account to cover the fee. Crigger was not indigent, and we therefore need not address his contention that R.C.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State ex rel. Jackson v. McFaulOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Pegan v. CrawmerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Brown v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Douglas v. MoneyOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Al'shahid v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 2015
- Smith v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Crigger v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Gilmore v. MitchellOhio Supreme Court · 1999
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.