Legal Opinion

United States v. William Kimmons, Howard Small, United States of America v. Bruce Lee Berta

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 8, 1992No. 90-5413, 90-5432PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAY, Circuit Judge:

In this consolidated appeal, William Kim-mons, Howard Small, and Bruce Lee Berta challenge the district court’s application of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. In addition, Small and Kimmons raise claims concerning the validity of their convictions. The appellants were charged with conspiracy to affect commerce by robbery of armored car companies, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a), and with related firearms offenses. A jury convicted Kim-mons and Small on all counts, and each received life imprisonment with additional concurrent sentences. In a separate…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Sharrar v. FelsingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Jerry Washington and Herbert Edward JamesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. Ex Parte RieberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. Sharrar v. FelsingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API