Legal Opinion
Dial v. Hi Lewis Oil Co.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided July 5, 1951No. 5891PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REEVES, Chief Judge.
These are actions to recover for. overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The suit was brought pursuant to the provisions of Section 216, Title 29 U.S.C.A. It is claimed by each of the plaintiffs that he was employed by the defendant, who “operated a motor fuel service station at Highway 40 and Pitman Road, Jackson County, Missouri.” It is further alleged that “said station was engaged in the distribution and sale of motor fuel to freight carriers engaged in interstate commerce.” Based upon these averments, they claimed overtime according to the standards of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Roland Electrical Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Martino v. Michigan Window Cleaning Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Boutell v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Northwestern-Hanna Fuel Co. v. McCombCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Sherry Corine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
- Rachal v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Savon Gas Stations No. 6, Inc. v. Shell Oil CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1962
- Mid-South Distributors and Cotton States, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Brennan v. YatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.