Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 8, 1942No. 37958PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, P. J.

— The question before us is whether a decree of divorce, silent as to alimony, may be modified at a subsequent term so as to allow alimony.

Appellant was plaintiff in a divorce action and obtained a decree in the Circuit Court of Jackson County in June, 1924. Although she prayed for alimony in her petition the decree made no mention of it. She was awarded the custody of the three minor children and allowed $125.00 per month for their support and maintenance.

In September,” 1940, she filed a motion to modify the decree. She states in her motion that when the decree was granted in 1924 she was in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kelley v. KelleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Howell v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. McClure v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Spain v. SpainSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. McIntire v. McIntireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Becker v. BeckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. McDougal v. McDougalMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Baker v. BakerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Willis v. WillisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Ballew v. BallewMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API