Legal Opinion

Repp v. Anadarko Municipal Hospital

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 19, 1994No. 93-6408PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd, a provision of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (“EMTALA”). Defendants moved for summary judgment, which the district court granted for all defendants. Plaintiffs appeal, *521alleging that defendant Anadarko Municipal Hospital violated its own policies and did not provide Kenneth Repp with proper emergency care. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.1

I. BACKGROUND

In the afternoon of March 26, 1992, Mr. Repp made an outpatient visit to defendant Dr. Jay Belt, complaining of a rash.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Committee for the First Amendment v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  2. Gatewood v. Washington Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  3. Baber v. Hospital Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  4. Satsky v. Paramount Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. Delaney v. CadeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Harold Summers v. Baptist Medical Center ArkadelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  2. Jackson v. East Bay HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1997
  3. Guzman Ex Rel. Guzman v. Memorial Hermann Hospital SystemDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
  4. Hoffman v. TonnemacherDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
  5. FISHER BY FISHER v. New York Health and Hospitals Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API