Repp v. Anadarko Municipal Hospital
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd, a provision of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (“EMTALA”). Defendants moved for summary judgment, which the district court granted for all defendants. Plaintiffs appeal, *521alleging that defendant Anadarko Municipal Hospital violated its own policies and did not provide Kenneth Repp with proper emergency care. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.1
I. BACKGROUND
In the afternoon of March 26, 1992, Mr. Repp made an outpatient visit to defendant Dr. Jay Belt, complaining of a rash.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Committee for the First Amendment v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Gatewood v. Washington Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Baber v. Hospital Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Satsky v. Paramount Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Delaney v. CadeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Harold Summers v. Baptist Medical Center ArkadelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Jackson v. East Bay HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1997
- Guzman Ex Rel. Guzman v. Memorial Hermann Hospital SystemDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- Hoffman v. TonnemacherDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
- FISHER BY FISHER v. New York Health and Hospitals Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.