Application of Woodling
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Judge.
An opinion in this case was rendered April 15, 1953. Subsequently, appellant filed a motion for reconsideration. That motion was granted and oral argument had.
In consequence of the contentions advanced by appellant and the answers thereto by the Solicitor for the Patent Office, a further study of the record, briefs of the parties, and our first opinion, was made. As a result, certain modifications have been made but none of them to the extent of reversing the holdings of the Patent Office as advocated by appellant. It is our conclusion that the holding by the Board of Appeals,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miller v. Brass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Mahn v. HarwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Picard v. United Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Sontag Chain Stores Co. v. National Nut Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Directoplate Corp. v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Application of Hugh Harper Gibbs and Richard Norman GriffinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Hugh Harper Gibbs and Richard Norman GriffinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Hugh Harper Gibbs and Richard Norman GriffinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.