Legal Opinion
Bush v. Mayerstein-Burnell Financial Services, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 3, 1986No. 2-1285-A-385PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant John D. Bush (Bush) appeals a summary judgment in favor of Mayerstein-Burnell Financial Services, Inc. (MBFS), James R. Ransom (Ransom) and Nancy Barbour (Barbour), defendants below. The controversy involves a denial of coverage under a temporary medical insurance policy.
We affirm.
Viewing the relevant facts most favorable to Bush, the non-moving party below, it appears that in the summer of 1983 Bush was seeking new employment. Bush was aware that his current major medical insurance coverage would terminate upon leaving his employment. He contacted his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stockberger v. Meridian Mutual InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- American Family Mutual Insurance v. KivelaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Young v. Van ZandtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Hutchison Bros. Excavation Co. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Goldstein v. OCCIDENTAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. OF CAL.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Craven v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Tate v. Secura InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Dahlke v. John F. Zimmer Insurance Agency, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Bush v. Washington National InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Tate v. Secura InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990