Legal Opinion
Tate v. Secura Insurance
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 30, 1990No. 49A02-8906-CV-288Published
1Opinion of the Court
561 N.E.2d 814 (1990)
Thomas TATE, Appellant (Plaintiff below),
v.
SECURA INSURANCE, a Mutual Company, Appellee (Defendant below).
No. 49A02-8906-CV-288.
Court of Appeals of Indiana, Second District.
October 30, 1990.
W.F. Conour, Rex E. Baker, Conour Doehrman, Indianapolis, for appellant.
Steven H. Frank, Carter and Leerkamp, Indianapolis, for appellee.
SULLIVAN, Judge.
Thomas Tate (Tate) appeals the court's decision granting summary judgment in favor of Secura Insurance, a Mutual Company (Secura). The controversy involves a claim under the underinsured provision of Tate's policy with Secura.
We affirm.
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Home Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. KennerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- Meridian Mutual Insurance Co. v. RichieIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Interstate Auction, Inc. v. Central National Insurance, Group, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.