Tate v. Secura Insurance
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, Judge.
Thomas Tate (Tate) appeals the court's decision granting summary judgment in favor of Secura Insurance, a Mutual Company (Secura). The controversy involves a claim under the underinsured provision of Tate's policy with Secura.
We affirm.
Tate presents four issues for our review. However, we need only address the following two:(1) Whether the underinsured motorist provisions of Tate's automobile policy with Secura require setoff of amounts recovered by Tate from the tortfeasor;(2) Whether the court erred in striking portions of the affidavit of an insurance expert offered by Tate…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Home Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. KennerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- Meridian Mutual Insurance Co. v. RichieIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Interstate Auction, Inc. v. Central National Insurance, Group, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Tate v. Secura InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Kiltz v. KiltzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. TurnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Tanton v. GrochowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Gardner v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.