Legal Opinion

Sirkin v. Schupler

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 24, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWest, C. J.

This is a suit to foreclose a mortgage on eeratin land therein described, given to secure the payment of an indebtedness represented by two promissory notes. The notes, which are dated January 29, 1920, were made by the defendant, Harry Sirkin, to the complainant, Joseph Schupler, and Louis Sclmtzer. The bill alleges that the complainant thereafter, on the 10th day of April, 1920, acquired by assignment from Louis Schutzer his interest in the indebtedness and mortgage given to secure its payment. It contains the following paragraph:

“That on the 30th day of March, A. D. 1921, the said Harry…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hill v. BeachamSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  2. Commercial Bank v. First National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  3. Carolina Portland Cement Co. v. RoperSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  4. Smith v. DowlingSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  5. Thompson v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Florida · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gus' Bath, Inc. v. LightbownSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. Van Eepoel Real Estate Co. v. Sarasota Milk Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
  3. Rambo v. DickensonSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  4. Thomas v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  5. Jacksonville Properties, Inc. v. Manhattan Beach Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API