Jacksonville Properties, Inc. v. Manhattan Beach Co.
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
— The questions presented for review in this appeal challenge the correctness of the decree of the chancellor as to matters therein contained which are based on findings of fact. There appears in the record sufficient substantial evidence to constitute a logical basis for each of the findings complained of. The decree should, therefore, be affirmed. Kreher vs. Morley, 84 Fla. 121, 92 Sou. 686, and cases there cited; Lassiter vs. Long, 85 Fla. 439, 96 Sou. 841; Summers vs. Apalachicola Northern Ry. Co., 85 Fla. 9, 96 Sou. 151; Kirkland vs. Hutto, 85 Fla. 82, 95 Sou. 429; Morton vs. Baya, 88…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Norton v. BayaSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
- Sommers v. Apalachicola Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
- Kreher v. MorleySupreme Court of Florida · 1922
- Ex Parte BoydstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Sirkin v. SchuplerSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Washington Loan & Trust Co. v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Deauville Casino Corp. v. Miami Beach Furnished Homes Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933