Legal Opinion
Marez v. STATE, TAX. & REV. DEPT., MVD
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided March 17, 1995No. 15733PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
The Motor Vehicle Division (MVD) revoked Appellant Kenneth Marez’ (Marez) driver’s license pursuant to the New Mexico Implied Consent Act. NMSA 1978, §§ 66-8-105 through 66-8-112 (Repl.Pamp.1994). The revocation was based on Marez’ refusal to take a breath-alcohol test. Marez appealed to the district court of Bernalillo County. The district court affirmed the revocation. Marez now appeals the district court’s affirmance. We are asked to address whether the Implied Consent Act and the criminal driving-while-intoxicated (DWI) charging statute, NMSA 1978, Section…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bradbury & Stamm Construction Co. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Price v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- State v. BristorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harvey E. Yates Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- State v. NelsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. KanikaynarNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- Yates Company v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996