Lancaster v. Flowers
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeals, Nos. 247 and 145, Jan. T., 1903, by Charles Yard, executor and trustee, and by Anna F.. Richardson, from decree of C. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., June T., 1892, No. 430, on bill in equity in case of Americus Lancaster et al. v. Ann Eliza Flowers et al. Bill in equity for partition. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Errors assigned were in dismissing various exceptions to report of James M. Beck, Esq., master.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Thompson,
This was a proceeding in equity for the partition of a certain piece of real estate situate on the east side of Eighth street and south side of Race street. George Flowers died seized of this property and left surviving him a widow and nine children, six daughters and three sons. The original bill was filed by Americus Lancaster as trustee for Josephine Flowers and Anna F. Richardson against the other parties in interest. Subsequently in 1894 an amended bill, amendatory of the original bill, was filed, and it averred title and prayed for partition and an account…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Yetter v. Delaware Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Kenyon v. WeltyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Drake v. LacoeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- McGowan v. Bailey, Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Lancaster v. FlowersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Champlin Oil & Refining Company v. ChastainTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- GAF CORPORATION v. Amchem Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Jones v. . BlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Shields v. HitchmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Hoog v. DiehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.