State v. Williams
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MANFORD, Judge.
This is a direct appeal from a jury conviction for rape, in violation of § 566.030, RSMo Supp. 1983, and sodomy, in violation of § 566.060, RSMo Supp. 1983. The judgment is affirmed.
While appellant formally presents two points, in reality he presents variations on a single issue. In summary, it is alleged that the trial court erred in failing to submit MAI-CR2d 2.37.1.2, in failing to submit paragraph 4 of MAI-CR2d 20.02.1 and in failing to submit paragraph 4 of MAI-CR2d 20.08.1. It is appellant’s assertion that these instructions must be given when there is evidence to support…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. BallardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. DigheraMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- State v. BeishirSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- State v. ButlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. StiersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Michael G. Tyson v. Clarence Trigg, Superintendent of the Indiana Youth Center and Attorney General of the State of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- State v. KoonceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1987
- Meyer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Michael G. Tyson v. Clarence Trigg, Superintendent of the Indiana Youth Center and Attorney General of the State of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995