Legal Opinion

Meyer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1989No. 54996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Judge.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant was convicted by a jury of forcible rape, forcible sodomy, kidnapping and second degree robbery and sentenced to consecutive terms of imprisonment total-ling 80 years. We affirmed his convictions in State v. Meyer, 694 S.W.2d 853 (Mo.App.1985). Statements of the facts are presented in Meyer and State v. Workes, 689 S.W.2d 782 (Mo.App.1985), the direct appeal of his codefendant.

In his Rule 27.26 motion as amended by appointed counsel, movant claimed his trial counsel, on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Armour v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. State v. KoonceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ChildersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. State v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Brownlow v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. State v. StewartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API