Legal Opinion

Michael G. Tyson v. Clarence Trigg, Superintendent of the Indiana Youth Center and Attorney General of the State of Indiana

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 13, 1995No. 94-3359Published

1Opinion of the Court

50 F.3d 436

Michael G. TYSON, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

Clarence TRIGG, Superintendent of the Indiana Youth Center;

and Attorney General of the State of Indiana,

Respondents-Appellees.

No. 94-3359.

United States Court of Appeals,

Seventh Circuit.

Argued Jan. 20, 1995.

Decided March 20, 1995.

Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Denied April

13, 1995.

Nathan Z. Dershowitz, Amy Adelson, Victoria B. Eiger, Dershowitz & Eiger, New York City, Alan M. Dershowitz (argued), Cambridge, MA, James H. Voyles, Symmes, Voyles, Zann, Paul & Hogan, Indianapolis, IN, for petitioner-appellant.

Arend J. Abel…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API