Legal Opinion

Beck v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 29, 1992No. S91G1476PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

The issue before us is whether the trial court made sufficient findings and conclusions to support its grant of a plea of double jeopardy. The defendant, Michael Odell Beck, was brought to trial on charges of child molestation. During the trial the court granted a motion for mistrial because the prosecutor violated an order that had excluded evidence of similar transactions. Beck later made a plea of double jeopardy that was predicated on the prosecutorial conduct that led to the mistrial.

Only where the governmental conduct in question is intended to “goad” the defendant into…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. State v. BeckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. State v. RoganHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. D'AURIACourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Spradley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Seymour v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API