Legal Opinion

Kedrovsky v. Archbishop & Consistory of the Russian Orthodox Greek Catholic Church

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 19, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The corporation known as the Archbishop and Consistory did not hold the legal title to the lands in controversy. It did not succeed to any title belonging to the unincorporated association known as the Archbishop and Consistory, for the reason that the latter association had no title to succeed to. The title was either in Archbishop Nemolovsky for the benefit of the faithful of the church within his diocese, or in the defendants to whom he attempted to transfer his trusts (whether successfully or not. we do not now decide), or in the faithful of the church themselves. In none of these views…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carrier v. . CarrierNew York Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kedroff v. Saint Nicholas Cathedral of the Russian Orthodox Church in North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Saint Nicholas Cathedral of the Russian Orthodox Church in North America v. KedroffNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Nikulnikoff v. Archbishop & Consistory of the Russian Orthodox Greek Catholic ChurchNew York Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Saint Nicholas Cathedral of Russian Orthodox Church in North America v. KedroffNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. First Methodist Church of Union Springs v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API