Legal Opinion
Alaska Pacific Fisheries v. Territory of Alaska
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 5, 1916No. 2709PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUNT, Circuit Judge.
In an act of Congress “for the protection and regulation of the fisheries of Alaska,” approved the 26th of June, 1906 (chapter 3547, 34 Stat. 478), it was provided, among other things, that every person or corporation carrying on the business of canning, curing, or preserving fish or manufacturing fish products within Alaska shall, “in lieu of all other license fees and taxes therefor and thereon, pay license taxes on their said business and output as follows: Canned salmon, four cents per case; pickled salmon, ten cents per barrel; salt salmon in bulk, five cents per one…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Binns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Lapina v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. PfostDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1931
- Alaska Mexican Gold Mining Co. v. Territory of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
- Pauley v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Northern Commercial Co. v. Territory of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
- Territory of Alaska v. Arctic MaidDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1956
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.