Legal Opinion
Haas v. Hodge
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 24, 1959No. Civ. 23577PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.
This case arises from a contract for the association of two doctors in the practice of medicine. The relationship having terminated, plaintiff Dr. George S. Haas brought suit against defendant Dr. James C. Hodge to obtain an injunction against his practicing within 25 miles of plaintiff’s offices, for damages and other relief. Judgment went for defendant and plaintiff appeals therefrom.
The contract (received in evidence as Exhibit 3) provides: “It is hereby stipulated and agreed by the parties that in the event this agreement is terminated for any reason whatsoever, that from and after the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Constans v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Martyn v. LeslieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- San Joaquin Light & Power Corp. v. CostaloupesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Singleton v. FullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Russell v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Greene v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Centeno v. Roseville Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- South Bay Radiology Medical Associates v. W. M. Asher, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Golden State Linen Service, Inc. v. VidalinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Estate of ForemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.