Legal Opinion

State Highway Commissioner v. Schultz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1963No. Calendar 2, Docket 49,509PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This appeal arises out of proceedings in eminent domain instituted by appellant highway commissioner pursuant to PA 1925, No 352, as amended. Said proceedings resulted from the improvement of trunk line highway US-12, now Interstate 94 or 1-94. Appellant is appealing from an order entered in the circuit court of Berrien county confirming an award of damages rendered by 3 appointed commissioners in the amount of $64,042.37.

Appellee owned a rectangular parcel of land consisting of 32-1/2 acres facing the west side of trunk line M-140, a north-south highway, located south of the village of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnstone v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. In Re Widening of Fulton StreetMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Boyne City, Gaylord & Alpena Railroad v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Flint & Pere Marquette Railroad v. Detroit & Bay City RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. In Re State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Department of Transportation v. TomkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. City of Detroit v. Michael's PrescriptionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. State Highway Commissioner v. FeginMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. State Highway Commissioner v. HessellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. City of Fenton v. LutzMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API