In Re State Highway Commissioner
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.
Petitioner seeks condemnation of respondent’s lands for widening a highway. An award was made by appointed commissioners. Petitioner filed objections to confirmation of their award, which objections were overruled. Petitioner brings certiorari. Respondent owns 20 acres of unplatted lands abutting 1,291.34 feet on the highway, in the proposed widening of which a strip 75 feet in width for the full length of respondent’s land is proposed to be taken. The commissioners awarded respondents $21,814.71 damages. Such commissioners, when appointed, are a constitutional tribunal with the same powers…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Toledo, Ann Arbor & Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. DunlapMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Johnstone v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- In Re Widening of Bagley AvenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Fitzsimons & Galvin, Inc. v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- In Re Widening of Fulton StreetMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re Brewster Street Housing SiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Department of Transportation v. TomkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Gowdy v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1967
- Wayne County v. Britton TrustMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re John C. Lodge HighwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.