Legal Opinion
United States v. Joseph J. C. Dicarlo and Ronald C. MacKenzie
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided April 20, 1978No. 78-1026PublishedCited by 138 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, Senior Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from the denial of a new trial. Appellants, Joseph J. C. DiCarlo and Ronald C. MaeKenzie, hereinafter defendants, were found guilty after a jury trial in the district court of conspiracy to violate, and of substantive violations of, the Hobbs and Travel Acts, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1951 and 1952. The offenses involved the extortion by defendants, then Massachusetts state senators, of $40,000 from McKee-Berger-Mansueto, Inc. (MBM), a New York based construction management firm, in connection with a report by a legislative committee chaired by DiCarlo…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- United States v. McGillCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Jeffrey Bernard Beeman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Charles D. Lema v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. WinterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Milton L. KobroskyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.