Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Manders v. Bd. of Trustees

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1981No. Nos. 81-644 and 81-645PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole issue before the court is whether appellant is required to consider an application for permanent and total disability benefits filed by an individual who is receiving partial disability benefits from the fund.

Appellant contends that because R. C. 742.37 provides no procedure for changing an award of partial disability benefits to one for permanent and total disability benefits, it lacks authority to consider appellees’ applications. In support, it relies on the general rule that a statutorily created board may not exceed the powers granted to it by statute. See, e.g., Consumers’…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Cooke v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Richard v. Board of Trustees of the Police & Firemen's Disability & Pension FundOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Richard v. Bd. of Trustees of Police & Firemen's Disability & Pension FundOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Dumas v. Bd. of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Thompson v. Board of Trustees of the Police & Fireman's Disability & Pension FundOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API