State ex rel. Dumas v. Bd. of Trustees
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appellants argue first that because appellee is already receiving disability benefits he is no longer a “member of the fund” entitled to seek an increased disability award. This argument was addressed and rejected in State, ex rel. Manders, v. Bd. of Trustees (1981), 68 Ohio St. 2d 79 [22 O.O.3d 275], In that case, retired members of the fund sought a *11reconsideration of their partial disability awards claiming their conditions had worsened and they should be considered permanently and totally disabled. We held at 80:
“R.C. 742.01(E) defines ‘[mjember of the fund’ as ‘* * * any person who is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Synod of Ohio of United Lutheran Church in America v. JosephOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- State ex rel. Manders v. Bd. of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by2 opinions
- State ex rel. Richard v. Board of Trustees of the Police & Firemen's Disability & Pension FundOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Richard v. Bd. of Trustees of Police & Firemen's Disability & Pension FundOhio Supreme Court · 1994