Kralicek v. Chaffey
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Terry Crabtree, Judge.
This appeal concerns a dispute between adjoining landowners over the right to use a twenty-five-foot alley that runs between their properties. The chancellor issued a decree quieting title to the alley in appellees. On appeal, appellants contend that the chancellor should have found that an easement by prescription or an easement by implication existed in their favor, or should have found that appellants were part-owners of the alley by virtue of Ark. Code Ann. § 14-301-306 (1987). We find no error and affirm.
The parties’ lots are adjacent to each other on the north side…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Goodwin v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Steward v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Manitowoc Remanufacturing, Inc. v. VocqueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Britton v. FloydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Adkinson v. KilgoreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Roetzel v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
- Central Arkansas Foundation Homes, LLC v. ChoateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
- Hanna v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
- Office of Child Support Enforcement v. NeelyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
- Walnut Ridge Golf Club, Inc. v. City of Walnut RidgeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.