Legal Opinion

Hanna v. Robinson

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 12, 2004No. CA 03-918PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert J. Gladwin, Judge.

Appellants appeal from an order granting appellees an easement by implication in appellants’ property. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

Because the transactions in this case were conducted by appellant Albert Hanna and appellee James Robinson, we will refer to the parties as Hanna and Robinson for the sake of convenience. Both parties own multi-story buildings in the city of El Dorado. Robinson’s building has a first floor, a mezzanine, and ' a second floor, and it houses Robinson’s delicatessen and catering service. Hanna’s building is located across…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Manitowoc Remanufacturing, Inc. v. VocqueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Black v. Van SteenwykSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Kennedy v. PappSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Greasy Slough Outing Club, Inc. v. AmickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  5. Diener v. RatterreeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Berry v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  2. Diamond K Investments, Inc. v. 1330 LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2024
  3. Garringer v. GarringerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API