Legal Opinion

Roetzel v. Coleman

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 3, 2010No. CA 09-162PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOSEPHINE LINKER HART, Judge.

|,The White County Circuit Court entered a summary judgment that construed an agreement between appellant Wade Roetzel and appellee Troy Coleman to be an option that Roetzel failed to exercise. The court also found that Coleman failed to prove his damages. The appeal and cross-appeal challenge those rulings. We affirm on direct appeal and on cross-appeal.

Coleman is the owner of certain real property containing over 1,1.00 acres located in White County. On February 1, 2004, the parties entered into an agreement, titled “CONTRACT OF SALE,” that provided, in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Minerva Enterprises, Inc. v. Bituminous Casualty Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Perry v. Baptist HealthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. McMillan v. Philadelphia Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Fryer v. BoyettCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Swift v. ErwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Patton Hospitality Management, LLC v. Bella Vista Village Coopershares Owners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  2. Trakru v. MathewsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Arvest Bank v. Tci Bentonville, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  4. Brookshire Grocery Company v. Lindsey-Pine Plaza, LLC.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API