Reiko Nakano et al. v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 REIKO NAKANO et al., CASE NO. 3:25-cv-05908-BHS 8 Plaintiff, ORDER 9 v. 10 STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, 11 Defendant. 12 13 THIS MATTER is before the Court on plaintiffs Reiko Nakano and Sam Cho’s 14 motion to strike defendant State Farm’s affirmative defenses. Dkt. 10. The case involves 15 a fire loss at Nakano’s1 home, and Nakano’s claim for coverage and benefits under her 16 State Farm homeowner’s policy. Dkt. 1-1. 17 State Farm’s Answer asserted 17 “affirmative” defenses: 18 1. The Complaint, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barnes v. AT & T Pension Benefit Plannonbargained ProgramDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Colorado Springs Production Credit Ass'n v. Farm Credit AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991
- Price v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Campagnolo S.R.L. v. Full Speed Ahead, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2009