Price v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Ollie F. Price, III appeals from an order dismissing his partition action on the ground that the United States, an indispensable party, had not consented to be sued. Plaintiff contends that the United States has consented to be sued. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.1
Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 372, the United States granted Isabelle Sposet Mahseet, a non-Indian, a fee simple patent for an undivided 23/378th interest in certain land in Oklahoma. Mahseet conveyed the interest to plaintiff by warranty deed. The land was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sac & Fox Nation v. HansonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Sac and Fox Nation v. HansonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Green v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2006
- Public Service Co. v. Approximately 15.49 Acres of Land in McKinleyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- Price v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.